This combination Condaliopsis obtusifolia var. canescens has not been published anywhere. The basionym Condalia divaricata is placed as Condaliopsis divaricata according to the reference on which this exchange is based.
Nesom, G. L. (2023). Ziziphus segregates in the USA and Mexico, including Sarcomphalus, Condaliopsis , and Conalma, gen. Nov. (Rhamnaceae). Phytoneuron, 2023(34), 1-132. (Vínculo)
@oscargsol thanks for your work on this. FYI, this swap, made without also splitting C. obtusifolia s.l., has thrown what appears to be several hundred observations back up to genus level because IDs of C. obtusifolia s.l. now conflict with new IDs of C. divaricata. For example, my observation here: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192037325 (this one is easy to fix when I update my ID but there appear to be 300+ observations, perhaps more, similarly affected).
I know, I realized it would be a problem to do so, but finding that a non-existent subspecies had previously been created by a previous taxonomic change seemed to me to be a greater problem than what would result from this change.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se reduce al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo.
@oscargsol thanks for your work on this. FYI, this swap, made without also splitting C. obtusifolia s.l., has thrown what appears to be several hundred observations back up to genus level because IDs of C. obtusifolia s.l. now conflict with new IDs of C. divaricata. For example, my observation here: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192037325 (this one is easy to fix when I update my ID but there appear to be 300+ observations, perhaps more, similarly affected).